PEN Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 1308 - 951X

Original article | International Journal of Research in Teacher Education 2019, Vol. 10(4) 35-49

In-Service EFL Teachers' Suggestions for Prospective Teachers of English

Kürşat Cesur & Gülsüm Duran-Güler

pp. 35 - 49   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1912-05-0005.R1

Published online: December 31, 2019  |   Number of Views: 601  |  Number of Download: 625


Abstract

The concept experience is a vital matter of fact in life of human being, which helps people move forward for the next phases of their lives. Also, this phenomenon is regarded to be the key word for education and teaching. This study aims to explore experienced teachers’ suggestions for the prospective teachers to adopt themselves to the requirements of students, school administration, lessons and being a teacher in their careers. A qualitative research methodology was followed in this descriptive study. A post “What are your suggestions for prospective teachers of English?” was sent to the most crowded five groups of EFL teachers on Facebook. The comments of 103 participants were content analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2010, and they were categorized under nine main headings. Suggestions were mostly about personal characteristics, use of variety, taking different courses, love, being aware of differences, gap between theory and practice, negative suggestions, difficulties and others. In the light of the findings, it could be stated that most of the in-service teachers have attached importance to personal traits as a teacher. ‘Being knowledgeable’ was the most reported answer among the suggested personal traits. In-service teachers also suggested the prospective teachers to make use of variety, to take different courses before they graduate, and to love their students and their jobs. Moreover, they expressed difficulties of being English teachers such as lack of respect and working at private schools. Though they are few, participants also had negative suggestions for prospective teachers. Few of them suggested them not to be teachers and look for other jobs. In the light of these results, some suggestions were presented to prospective teachers at the end of the study.

Keywords: In-service teachers; Prospective teachers; Problems; Suggestions


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Cesur, K. & Duran-Guler, G. (2019). In-Service EFL Teachers' Suggestions for Prospective Teachers of English . International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 10(4), 35-49.

Harvard
Cesur, K. and Duran-Guler, G. (2019). In-Service EFL Teachers' Suggestions for Prospective Teachers of English . International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 10(4), pp. 35-49.

Chicago 16th edition
Cesur, Kursat and Gulsum Duran-Guler (2019). "In-Service EFL Teachers' Suggestions for Prospective Teachers of English ". International Journal of Research in Teacher Education 10 (4):35-49.

References
  1. Alberto, P., & Troutman, A. C. (1986). Applied behavior analysis for teachers. Columbus: Merrill Pub. Co. [Google Scholar]
  2. CoHE. (2018). Ingilizce öğretmenliği lisans programı. Retrieved from https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Kurumsal/egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Yeni-Ogretmen-Yetistirme-Lisans-Programlari/Ingilizce_Ogretmenligi_Lisans_Programi.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cook, S. (2016). Advantages of Microsoft Excel. Retrieved from https://turbofuture.com/computers/Advantages-of-Microsoft-Excel. [Google Scholar]
  4. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-130.  [Google Scholar]
  5. Dacin, P. A. & Mitchell, A. A. (1986). The measurement of declarative knowledge, Advances in Consumer Research, 13, 454-459. [Google Scholar]
  6. Delaney, J. (2010). How high school students perceive effective teachers. (Unpublished paper). Faculty of Education: Memorial University of Newfoundland. [Google Scholar]
  7. Demirel, Ö. (1991). Türkiye'de yabancı dil ögretmeni yetiştirmede karşılaşılan güçlükler. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6, 25-39.  [Google Scholar]
  8. Feiman-Nemser, S., Remillard, J. (1995). Perspectives on learning to teach. Published by National Center for Research on Teacher Learning 116 Erickson Hall Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1034. Issue Paper 95-3. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The knower and known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. Review of Research in Education, 20, 3-56. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jamei, S. (2016). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of a good teacher of ESL in three different secondary schools in Malmö. Retrieved from http://muep.mau.se/handle/2043/20153. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kasapoğlu, K. (2015). A review of studies on school experience and practice teaching in Turkey. Hacettepe University Journal of Faculty of education, 30(1), 147-162. [Google Scholar]
  12. Keller, H. (n.d.). Helen Keller Quotes. Retrieved from https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/helen_keller_101340. [Google Scholar]
  13. Krippendorf, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kristjánsdóttir, L., Bjarnadóttir, L., & Lefever, S. (2006). Úttekt á enskukennslu í grunnskólum veturinn 2005-2006. Retrieved from http://reykjavik.is/sites/default/files/ymis_skjol/skjol_utgefid_efni/enskukennsla.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  15. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174. [Google Scholar]
  16. Leinhardt, G. & Smith, D. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 75-95. [Google Scholar]
  17. Metcalfe, A., & Game, A. (2006). The teacher's enthusiasm. Australian Educational Researcher, 33(3), 91-106. [Google Scholar]
  18. Meyer, D. Z., & Avery, L. M. (2009). Excel as a qualitative data analysis tool. Field Methods, 21(1), 91–112. [Google Scholar]
  19. Penman, J., & Ellis, B. (2009). Regional academics' perceptions of the love of learning and its importance for their students. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 49, 148-168. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ramsden, P., Margetson, D., Martin, E., & Clarke, S. (1995). Recognising and rewarding good teaching. Canberra: AGPS.  [Google Scholar]
  21. Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity, Educational Psychology, 7(3), 243-267. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sahdra, B. & Thagard, P. (2003), Procedural knowledge in molecular biology, Philosophical Psychology, 16(4), 477-498. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sarıçoban, A. (2009). Pre-service ELT teachers’ concerns about student teaching through classroom observations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1),703–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  24. Sarıçoban, A. (2016). Foreign language teaching practicum beliefs of prospective teachers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 12(1), 166-176. [Google Scholar]
  25. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14. [Google Scholar]
  26. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581. [Google Scholar]
  27. Slee, R. (2001). Social justice and the changing directions in educational research: The case of inclusive education. Inclusive Education, 5(2/3), 167–177.  [Google Scholar]
  28. Stronge, J. H. (2007). Qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development. [Google Scholar]
  29. Tigchelaar, A., & Korthagen, F. (2004). Deepening the exchange of student teaching experiences: Implications for the pedagogy of teacher education of recent insights into teacher behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 665-679. [Google Scholar]
  30. Weinstein, C. S. (1988). Preservice teachers’ expectations about the first year of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 31-40. [Google Scholar]
  31. Worthy, J. (2005). It didn’t have to be so hard: The first years of teaching in an urban school. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(3), 379-398. [Google Scholar]