PEN Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 1308 - 951X

Original article | International Journal of Research in Teacher Education 2020, Vol. 11(3) 19-36

Haiku and mindfulness for teacher education: A discourse analysis

Hongnguyen (Gwen) Nguyen & Wolff-Michael Roth

pp. 19 - 36   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1911-05-0005

Published online: September 30, 2020  |   Number of Views: 26  |  Number of Download: 197


Abstract

Many teachers turn to mindfulness practice as a means to deal with their stress, to develop reflexivity, and to improve their teaching efficacy. In addition, research indicates that teachers who practice mindfulness also may support their students’ personal growth while helping them to learn. Writing haiku, a Japanese form of poetry, has been used in language, poetry, and nursing education to address the same issues, with the same goal and with similar results. This study was designed to investigate the discourses that teachers may encounter if they were to search for online resources regarding mindfulness practice or the writing of haiku. Employing discourse analysis, our analyses reveal that the texts pertaining to the two fields of endeavour share topics (catharsis) and discursive repertoires (experience, qualities practice), which are subdivided in more fine-grained repertoires (autobiography, affect, form, and minimalism). We present salient commonalities of the discursive resources of these two practices; and we conclude that the teaching of haiku and mindfulness should be integrated in teacher education.

Keywords: mindfulness, haiku, discourses, discourse analysis, interpretative repertoires, teacher education


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Nguyen, H.(. & Roth, W. (2020). Haiku and mindfulness for teacher education: A discourse analysis . International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 11(3), 19-36.

Harvard
Nguyen, H. and Roth, W. (2020). Haiku and mindfulness for teacher education: A discourse analysis . International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 11(3), pp. 19-36.

Chicago 16th edition
Nguyen, Hongnguyen (Gwen) and Wolff-Michael Roth (2020). "Haiku and mindfulness for teacher education: A discourse analysis ". International Journal of Research in Teacher Education 11 (3):19-36.

References
  1. Baer, R. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 125-143. [Google Scholar]
  2. Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19, 1207-1221. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N., & Carmody, J. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230-241. [Google Scholar]
  4. Blasko, D. G., & Merski, D. W. (1998). Haiku poetry and metaphorical thought: An invitation to interdisciplinary study. Creative Research Journal, 11(1), 39-46. [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211-237. [Google Scholar]
  6. Christopher, M. S., Richard, J. G., Brant ,S. R, Matthew, H., Greg, B., Aaron L. B., & David, T. Z. (2015). A pilot study evaluating the effectiveness of a mindfulness-based intervention on cortisol awakening response and health outcomes among law enforcement officers. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 31(1), 15-28. [Google Scholar]
  7. Davis, J. H. (2015). Facing up to the question of ethics in mindfulness-based intervention. Mindfulness, 6(1), 46-48. [Google Scholar]
  8. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  9. Felver, J. C., & Jennings, P. A. (2016). Applications of mindfulness-based interventions in school settings: An introduction. Mindfulness, 7(1), 1-4. [Google Scholar]
  10. Flook, L., Goldberg, S. B., Pinger, L., Bonus, K., & Davidson, R. J. (2013). Mindfulness for teachers: A pilot study to assess effects on stress, burnout, and teaching efficacy. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(3), 182-195. [Google Scholar]
  11. Foster, D. (2016). Is Mindfulness Making Us Ill? The Guardian. Retrieved from. http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/jan/23/is-mindfulness-making-us-ill? [Google Scholar]
  12. Frank, J. L., Reibel, D., Broderick, P., Cantrell, T., & Metz, S. (2015). The effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction on educator stress and well-being: Results from a pilot study. Mindfulness, 6(2), 208-216. [Google Scholar]
  13. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hsu, P.-L., & Roth, W.-M. (2009). An analysis of teacher discourse that introduces real science activities to high school students. Research in Science Education, 39, 553-574. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hue, M., & Lau, N. (2015). Promoting well-being and preventing burnout in teacher education: A pilot study of a mindfulness-based programme for pre-service teachers in Hong Kong. Teacher Development, 19(3), 381-401, doi: 10.1080/13664530.2015.1049748 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  16. Hyland, T. (2009). Mindfulness and the therapeutic function of education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43(1), 119-131. [Google Scholar]
  17. Janerio, A. M. (1970). Japanese and Western literature. North Clarendon, VT: Tuttle. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jennings, P. A., Snowberg, K. E., Coccia, M. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2011). Improving classroom learning environments by Cultivating Awareness and Resilience in Education (CARE): Results of two pilot studies. Journal of Classroom Interactions, 46, 27-48. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York: Dell.  [Google Scholar]
  20. Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Perseus. [Google Scholar]
  21. Langer, E. J., & Moldoveaunu, M. (2000). Mindfulness research and the future. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 129-139. [Google Scholar]
  22. Marshall, I. (2013). Stalking the gaps: The biopoetics of haiku. Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, 46(4), 91-107. [Google Scholar]
  23. Monteiro, L. M., Musten, R. F., & Compson, J. (2015). Traditional and contemporary mindfulness: Finding the middle path in the tangle of concerns. Mindfulness, 6(1), 1-13. [Google Scholar]
  24. Peipei, Q. (2005). Basho and the Dao: The Zhuangzi and the transformation of haiku. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. [Google Scholar]
  25. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  26. Roeser, R. W., Schonert-Reich, K. A., Jha, A., Cullen, M., Wallace, L., Wilensky, R., Oberle, E., Thomson, K., Taylor, C., & Harrison J. (2013). Mindfulness training and reductions in teacher stress and burnout: Results from two randomized, waitlist-control field trials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 787-804.  doi: 10.1037/a0032093 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  27. Roth, W.-M., & Alexander, T. (1997). The interaction of students’ scientific and religious discourses: Two case studies. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 125-146. [Google Scholar]
  28. Roth, W-M., & Hsu, P-L. (2010). Analyzing communication: Praxis of method. Rotterdam: Sense. [Google Scholar]
  29. Roth, W.-M., & Lucas, K. B. (1997). From ‘truth’ to ‘invented reality’: A discourse analysis of high school physics students’ talk about scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 145-179. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rudnick, S. (2003). The haiku moment: Writing from the felt sense. Paper presented at the 15th International Focusing Conference, Pforzheim, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  31. Singh, N. N., Lancioni, G. E., Winton, A. S., Karazsia, B. T., & Singh, J. (2013). Mindfulness training for teachers changes the behaviour of their preschool students. Research in Human Development, 10(3), 211-233. [Google Scholar]
  32. Stanley, S. (2014). Mindfulness, Overview. In T. Thomas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology. New York: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  33. Stephenson, K., & Rosen, D. H. (2013). Extending the expressive writing paradigm: Is writing haiku poetry healing? Reports from the Faculty of Clinical Psychology, Kyoto Bunkyo University, 6, 129-138. [Google Scholar]
  34. Stephenson, K., & Rosen, D. H. (2015). Haiku and healing: An empirical study of poetry writing as therapeutic and creative intervention. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 33(1), 36-60. [Google Scholar]
  35. Tanaka, M. (2014). Transformative inquiry in teacher education: Evoking the soul of what matters. Teacher Development: An International Journal of Teachers’ Professional Development, 19(2), 133-150. doi: 10.1080/13664530.2014.992459 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  36. Tanaka, M., Stanger, N, Tse, V., & Farish, M. (2014). Transformative inquiry iBook (version 4.0). http://transformativeinquiry.ca/downloads/ [Google Scholar]
  37. Tanaka, M., & Tse, V. (2015). Touching the inexplicable: Poetry as transformative inquiry. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(3), 45-62. [Google Scholar]
  38. Thompson, J. (2007). Changing ideas and beliefs in lifelong learning? In D. Aspin (Ed.) Philosophical perspectives on lifelong learning, pp. 293-309. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Springer. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tsuchie, S. (2009). Carrying forward focusing using ‘insight.’ Paper presented at the 21st International Focusing Conference, Awaji, Japan. [Google Scholar]
  40. Vaquer, M-E. (2016). Poetics of curriculum, poetics of life. Rotterdam: Sense. [Google Scholar]
  41. Vygotsky, L. S. (1971). The psychology of art (Scripta Technica, Inc., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1925) Partially available at http://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/1925/index.htm [Google Scholar]
  42. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 1: Problems of general psychology. New York: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wakan, N. B. (2003). Haiku-writing: Learning from the pine. Green Teacher, 72, 13. [Google Scholar]
  44. Walsh, R. (2011). Lifestyle and mental health. American Psychologist, 66, 579-592. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wells, N. M. (2000). At home with nature: Effects of ‘greenness’ on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32, 775-795. [Google Scholar]
  46. Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1988). Discourse analysis and the identification of interpretative repertoires. In A. Antaki (Ed.), Analysing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods (pp. 168-183). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  47. Williams, J. M. G. (2010). Mindfulness and psychological process. Emotion, 10, 1-7. doi:10.1037/a0018360 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  48. Williams, J. M. G., Kabat-Zinn J. (2011). Mindfulness: Diverse perspectives on its meaning, origins, and multiple applications at the intersection of science and dharma. Contemporary Buddhism, 12, 1-18. [Google Scholar]
  49. Willig, C. (2014). Discourse and discourse analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative analysis. London: Sage, 341-354. [Google Scholar]
  50. Yasuda, K. (1975). The Japanese haiku: Its essential nature, history, and possibilities in English, with selected examples. Rutland, VT: Tuttle. [Google Scholar]
  51. Zeyer, A., & Roth, W.-M. (2009). A mirror of society: A discourse analytic study of 14-15-year-old Swiss students’ talk about environment and environmental protection. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 961-998. [Google Scholar]
  52. Zeyer, A., & Roth, W.-M. (2013). Post-ecological discourse in the making. Public Understanding of Science, 22, 33-48. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zizovic, S. V., & Toyota, J. (2012). Emptiness in haiku poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars. [Google Scholar]