PEN Academic Publishing-   |  ISSN: 1308 - 951X

Original article | International Journal of Research in Teacher Education 2022, Vol. 13(3) 38-55

Experiences of In-service Teachers on Online In-Service Training during Pandemic Period

Hati̇ce Ci̇lsalar Sagnak, Gamze Kaya, Hali̇l Toker & Burak Alti̇ntas

pp. 38 - 55   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2204-11-0003

Published online: September 26, 2022  |   Number of Views: 14  |  Number of Download: 58


Abstract

 With the pandemic, all teachers’ professional development programs suddenly moved to online platforms. Thus, this research aimed to determine how teachers’ online in-service training practices during the pandemic Covid-19 affect their technology integration indicators and technology integration self-efficacy. We conducted the study as a correlational design with the participation of 303 in-service teachers. As a result, male teachers have lower perceptions than female ones, while there is no significant difference between branches about online in-service training. Teachers working for over ten years and married ones are more willing to attend online in-service training activities.

Keywords: Professional development, online training, teacher education, technology integration, technology self-efficacy.


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Sagnak, H.C., Kaya, G., Toker, H. & Alti̇ntas, B. (2022). Experiences of In-service Teachers on Online In-Service Training during Pandemic Period . International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 13(3), 38-55.

Harvard
Sagnak, H., Kaya, G., Toker, H. and Alti̇ntas, B. (2022). Experiences of In-service Teachers on Online In-Service Training during Pandemic Period . International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 13(3), pp. 38-55.

Chicago 16th edition
Sagnak, Hati̇ce Ci̇lsalar, Gamze Kaya, Hali̇l Toker and Burak Alti̇ntas (2022). "Experiences of In-service Teachers on Online In-Service Training during Pandemic Period ". International Journal of Research in Teacher Education 13 (3):38-55.

References
  1. Akkaya, S., & Kapıdere, M. (2021). How do digital games utilization levels predict a teacher's digital material development self-efficacy?. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 13(2), 322–335. doi: 10.18844/wjet.v13i2.5716 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  2. Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In Anderson, T. & Elloumi, F. (Edts), Theory and Practice of Online Learning, (pp. 3-32). Canada, Edmonton: AU Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aslan, S. (2022). Using cooperative learning and the flipped classroom model with prospective teachers to increase digital literacy self-efficacy, technopedagogical education, and 21st-century skills competence. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(3), 121-137. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2022.439.9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  4. Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Stürmer, K., & Scheiter, K. (2021). Variability of teachers’ technology integration in the classroom: A matter of utility!. Computers & Education, 166, 104–159. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104159 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  5. Başkan, H. (2001). İlköğretim okullarında görevli öğretmenlerin hizmet ıçi eğitim programlarının etkililiğine ilişkin algı ve beklentileri(Denizli ili örneği) [Perception and expectations in ınternal education service programs of teachers serving on primary schools (Denizli city sample)]. MA Thesis. Pamukkale University Social Sciences Institute. [Google Scholar]
  6. Baştürk, R. (2012). İlköğretim öğretmenlerinin hizmetiçi eğitime yönelik algı ve beklentilerinin incelenmesi. [Investigation of elementary school teachers’ perception and expectations about in-service education]. Hacettepe University Journal of Faculty of Education, 42, 96–107. http://efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/314-published.pdf [Google Scholar]
  7. Bilgin, K. U. (2007). Yerel yönetimlerde hizmet içi eğitim[In-service training in municipal corporation]. Ankara: Matsa. [Google Scholar]
  8. Birişçi, S, & Kul, Ü. (2018) Pedagojik formasyon eğitimi alan öğretmen adaylarının teknoloji entegrasyonu öz-yeterlik inanışlarının incelenmesi. [Investigation of technology ıntegration self-efficacy beliefs of preservice teachers’ who attend pedagogical formation training]. Journal of Science Mathematics Innovation and Technology, 1, 1–18. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/579640 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cooper, J. D. (2008). Professional development: An effective research-based model. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Supplemental Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cömert, M. (2018). A qualitative research on the contribution of in-service training to the vocational development of teachers. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(7), 114–129. doi:10.11114/jets.v6i7.3239 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  11. Çakır, R., & Yıldırım, S. (2009). Bilgisayar öğretmenleri okullardaki teknoloji entegrasyonu hakkında ne düşünürler? [What do computer teachers think about the factors affecting technology integration in schools?]. İlköğretim Online, 8(3), 952–964. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/90847 [Google Scholar]
  12. Çakıroğlu, Ü., Gökoğlu, S., & Çebi, A. (2015). Basic indicators for teachers’ technology ıntegration: A scale development study. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 35(3), 507–522. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gefad/issue/29790/320326 [Google Scholar]
  13. Çınar, M., Ekici, M., & Demir, Ö. (2021). A snapshot of the readiness for e-learning among in-service teachers prior to the pandemic-related transition to e-learning in Turkey. Teaching and Teacher Education, 107, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103478 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  14. Demir, M. K. (2013). Perception of classroom and branch teachers working in primary schools towards in-service education. Africa Journal of Adult Education, 1(4), 075–082. doi: 10.5897/ERR12.157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  15. Demirci, C., & Yılmaz, R. (2021). Investigation of Web 2.0 rapid content development self-efficacy perception levels of teachers working in secondary schools. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(2), 411–421. doi:10.46827/ejes.v8i2.3593 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  16. Demirel, P., & Budak, Y. (2003). Öğretmenlerin hizmetiçi eğitim ihtiyacı [In-service training needs for teachers]. Educational Administration: Theory and Practise, 33(33), 62–81. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/108446 [Google Scholar]
  17. Directorate for EU Affairs (2019). Türkiye-European Union Relations. https://www.ab.gov.tr/4_en.html [Google Scholar]
  18. Domiter, M., & Marciszewska, A. (2017). The role of non-profit organizations in teacher education–case study. Ekonomia XXI Wieku, 2 (14), 39–55. doi: 10.15611/e21.2017.2.03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  19. Eden, S., Heiman, T., & Olenik‐Shemesh, D. (2013). Teachers’ perceptions, beliefs and concerns about cyberbullying. British Journal of Educational Technology 44(6), 1036–1052. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01363.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  20. Ekpoh, U. I., Edet, A. O., & Nkama, V. I. (2013). Staff development programmes and secondary school teachers' job performance in Uyo Metropolis, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(12), 217–222. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/6541 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ergin, İ., Akseki, B., & Deniz, E. (2012). İlköğretim okullarında görev yapan sınıf öğretmenlerinin hizmet içi eğitim ihtiyaçları. [In-service education needs of class teachers teaching at elementary schools]. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 11(22), 55–66. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/esosder/issue/6156/82724 [Google Scholar]
  22. Eroğlu, M., & Donmus Kaya, V. (2021). Professional development barriers of teachers: A qualitative research. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(2), 1896–1922. http://ijci.wcci-international.org/index.php/IJCI/article/view/396 [Google Scholar]
  23. Esfijani, A., & Zamani, B. E. (2020). Factors influencing teachers’ utilisation of ICT: The role of in-service training courses and access. Research in Learning Technology, 28, 1–16. doi:10.25304/rlt.v28.2313 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  24. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice (2019). Digital education at school in Europe- Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/digital-education-school-europe_en [Google Scholar]
  25. Flores, M. A., & Gago, M. (2020). Teacher education in times of COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal: National, institutional and pedagogical responses. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 507–516. doi: 10.1080/02607476.2020.1799709 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  26. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education. 7th ed. New York. McGraw-Hill Companies. [Google Scholar]
  27. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Kwang, S. K. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. doi:10.3102/00028312038004915 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  28. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2012). IBM SPSS Statistics 19 Step by Step. Boston, Mass. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gokdas, F. & Cam, A. (2022). Examination of digital literacy levels of science teachers in the distance education process. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 17(2), 208-224. doi: 10.29329/epasr.2022.442.9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  30. Gökyer, N. (2012). Öğretmenlerin hizmetiçi eğitim sürecinde karşılaştıkları sorunlar ve öncelikli ihtiyaç duydukları konular. [The problems and priority ıssues of teachers they need in the process in-service training]. Turkey Social Research Journal, 162, 233–267. doi: [Google Scholar]
  31. Groeneveld, R. A., & Meeden, G. (1984). Measuring skewness and kurtosis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D(The Statistician), 33(4), 391–399. doi: 10.2307/2987742 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  32. Gültekin, M., & Çubukçu, Z.((2008)). İlköğretim öğretmenlerinin hizmetiçi eğitime ilişkin görüşleri[Perceptions of primary school teachers about ın-service training]. Manas University Journal of Social Sciences, 10(19), 185–201. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/manassosyal/issue/49945/640047 [Google Scholar]
  33. Harwell, S. H. (2003). Teacher professional development: It’s not an event, It’s a process. Waco: CORD. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hebebci, M. T., Bertiz, Y., & Alan, S. (2020). Investigation of views of students and teachers on distance education practices during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science(IJTES), 4(4), 267–282. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1271267 [Google Scholar]
  35. Islahi, F. (2019). Exploring teacher attitude towards information technology with a gender perspective. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1), 37–54. doi:10.30935/cet.512527 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  36. Islahi, F. & Nasreen N. (2013) Who make effective teachers, men or women? An Indian perspective. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(4), 285–293. doi:10.13189/ujer.(2013).010402. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  37. Jacobsen, D. M. (2001). Building different bridges: Technology ıntegration, engaged student learning, & new approaches to professional development. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA, April 10–14. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED453232.pdf [Google Scholar]
  38. Jung, I. (2001). Issues and challenges of providing online in-service teacher training: Korea's experience. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2(1), 1–18.  doi:10.19173/irrodl.v2i1.30 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  39. Kalloo, R. C., Mitchell, B., & Kamalodeen, V. J. (2020). Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic in Trinidad and Tobago: Challenges and opportunities for teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 452–462. doi: 10.1080/02607476.2020.1800407 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  40. Karasolak, K. T., Tanrıseven, I., Yavuz Konokman, G. (2013). Öğretmenlerin hizmetiçi eğitim etkinliklerine ilişkin tutumlarının belirlenmesi. [Determining teachers’ attitudes towards ın-service education activities]. Kastamonu Journal of Education, 21(3), 997–1010. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/kefdergi/issue/22605/241569 [Google Scholar]
  41. Khan, B. H.(Ed.). 1997. Web-based instruction. Educational Technology Publications. USA:New Jersey. [Google Scholar]
  42. Khan, I. U., Ayaz, M., & Faheem, M. (2016). The role of social media in development of English language vocabulary at university level. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(12), 2222–6990. doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/V6-I11/2444 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  43. Khan, I. U., Khan, S. U., & Khan, M. U. (2020). Perceptions of teachers regarding out in their professional development in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Global Educational Studies Review, 1, 52–63. doi: 10.31703/gesr.(2020)(V-I).01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  44. Kidd, W., & Murray, J. (2020). The Covid-19 pandemic and its effects on teacher education in England: How teacher educators moved practicum learning online. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 542–558. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2020.1820480 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  45. Lessing, A., & De Witt, M. (2007). The value of continuous professional development: Teachers' perceptions. South African Journal of Education, 27(1), 53–67. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/saje/article/view/25098 [Google Scholar]
  46. Lim, T., Abas, Z. W., & Mansor, N. (2010). Online in-service teacher professional development in Malaysia: A new possibility?.  In Z. Abas, I. Jung & J. Luca (Eds.), Proceedings of Global Learn Asia Pacific 2010--Global Conference on Learning and Technology (pp. 4025-4034). Penang, Malaysia: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 21, 2022 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/34494/. [Google Scholar]
  47. Limon, I. (2014). Yüz yüze ve uzaktan hizmet içi eğitim faaliyetlerine yönelik öğretmen algıları (Sakarya ili örneği). [Perceptions of teachers for face-to-face and remote ın-service training activities (Sakarya province case)] (Unpublished master thesis). Sakarya University, Educational Sciences Institute, Sakarya. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lloyd, M., & McRobbie, C. (2005). The ‘whole approach’: An investigation of a school-based practicum model of teacher professional development in ICT, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(4), 341–351. doi: 10.2190/623G-MT8A-VC17-R1T [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  49. Metin, E. M. (2018). Eğitimde teknoloji kullanımında öğretmen eğitimi: Bir durum çalışması. [Teacher training using technology in education: A case study]. Journal of STEAM Education, 1(1), 79–103. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/steam/issue/37516/427032 [Google Scholar]
  50. Moyo, N. (2020). COVID-19 and the future of practicum in teacher education in Zimbabwe: Rethinking the new normal in quality assurance for teacher certification. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 536–545. doi: 10.1080/02607476.2020.1802702 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  51. Mutton, T. (2020). Teacher education and Covid-19: Responses and opportunities for new pedagogical initiatives. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 439–44. doi: 10.1080/02607476.2020.1805189 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  52. Odanga, S. J., Aloka, P. J., & Raburu, P. A. (2015). Influence of marital status on teachers’ self-efficacy in secondary schools of Kisumu County, Kenya. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(3), 115–124. doi:10.5901/ajis.2015.v4n3p115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  53. Official Gazette (2014). The Regulation on Primary Education Institutions. Number: 29072. [Google Scholar]
  54. Pehlivan, İ. (2019). Hizmet içi eğitim - verimlilik ilişkisi [Relationship between inservice training and productivity]. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences(JFES), 25, 151–162. doi: 10.1501/Egifak_0000000627 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  55. Ramot, R., & Schmidt, S. D. (2021). COVID-19: Education policy, autonomy and alternative teacher education in Israel. Perspectives in Education, 39(1), 372–389. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-persed_v39_n1_a23 [Google Scholar]
  56. Polat, M. (2021). Pre-Service teachers' digital literacy levels, views on distance education and pre-university school memories. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(5), 299-314. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2021.375.19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  57. Signer, B. (2008) Online professional development: Combining best practices from teacher, technology and distance education. Journal of In‐service Education, 34(2), 205–218. doi: 10.1080/13674580801951079 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  58. Tekel, E., Öztekin-Bayır, Ö., & Dulay, S. (2022). Teaching practicum during Covid-19 pandemic: A comparision of the practices in different countries. International Journal of Progressive Education. 18(2), 71-86. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2022.431.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  59. Trentin, G., & Scimeca, S. (1999). The roles of tutors and experts in designing online education courses. Distance Education, 20(1), 144–161. doi: 10.1080/0158791990200111 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  60. Turgut, G., & Başarmak, U. (2019). Ortaokul öğretmenlerinin teknoloji entegrasyonu yeterliliklerinin farklı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi [A review of technology integration competencies of secondary school teachers according to various variables]. TAY Journal, 3(2), 51–66. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tayjournal/issue/57153/806574 [Google Scholar]
  61. Ünal, E., & Teker, N. (2018). Teknoloji entegrasyonuna yönelik öz-yeterlik algısı ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. [The adaptation of technology integration self-efficacy scale into Turkish]. Anemon Muş Alparslan University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(6), 973–978. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/anemon/article/400497 [Google Scholar]
  62. Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231–250. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2004.10782414 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  63. Yazıcı, Ö., & Gündüz, Y. (2011). Gelişmiş bazı ülkeler ile Türkiye’deki öğretmenlerin hizmet içi eğitimlerinin karşılaştırılması [Comparison of inservice training of teachers in some developed countries and Turkey]. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 4(2), 1–15. https://keg.aku.edu.tr/arsiv/c4s2/c4s2m1.pdf [Google Scholar]
  64. Yunkul, E. & Gunes, A. M. (2022). The relationship between prospective teachers’ digital literacy skills, attitude towards the teaching profession and academic motivations. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 17(3), 140-163. doi: 10.29329/epasr.2022.461.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  65. Zancajo, A., Verger, A., & Bolea, P. (2022). Digitalization and beyond: The effects of Covid-19 on post-pandemic educational policy and delivery in Europe. Policy and Society, 41(1), 111–128. doi:10.1093/polsoc/puab016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]